Raising the
Standard
Ethics, Responsibility and Buyer education
Red Flags Reveal the Program
Standard #8
Written by Ashley Young, LakeHaus Kennels — Breeder, trainer, and advocate for purposeful, ethical German Shorthaired Pointer breeding.
You can learn a lot about a breeding program by paying attention to the patterns — not just the puppies.
Red flags aren’t always dramatic. Most of the time, they show up quietly in how a program operates, explains itself, and makes decisions. One red flag on its own may not mean much, but multiple red flags together usually tell a story.
​
Key themes in this standard include:
-
Why patterns matter more than individual puppies
-
Common justifications that signal deeper problems
-
How scale, access, and trends reveal program priorities
-
Why red flags should be evaluated collectively, not in isolation
Red Flags Often Hide in Plain Sight
Statements like “our vet says they’re healthy, so we didn’t feel the need to test,” “we know our lines,” or “the parents are healthy” should give buyers pause. A routine vet exam, familiarity with pedigrees, or outward health does not replace proper health testing. Ethical programs understand that health testing exists to catch what experience and observation alone cannot.
Breeding prior to full maturity or before appropriate health testing is completed is another common concern. While patience isn’t always convenient, ethical breeding requires waiting until a dog has been fully evaluated — physically, mentally, and structurally — before being used to produce the next generation. Potential alone is not proof.
Scale, Trends, and Oversight Tell a Story
Volume and access also matter. Excessive litters year after year, heavy reliance on guardian homes, or dogs spread across multiple households can raise questions about meaningful oversight, evaluation, and accountability. Guardian homes can be used responsibly, but overuse often points to a program expanding faster than it can ethically support.
Overuse of a single stud is another red flag that often gets overlooked. Even a very good dog can do harm to a breed if used too frequently. Ethical programs are mindful of genetic diversity and long-term consequences, not just short-term success or popularity.
Programs producing multiple breeds deserve thoughtful evaluation as well. This isn’t automatically a problem — some breeders are deeply involved and knowledgeable across more than one breed. But when multiple breeds are produced without clear purpose, active involvement, or meaningful evaluation for each, it often signals a lack of focus rather than versatility.
Breeding for off-colors, rare coat types, or whatever happens to be trending at the moment is another common warning sign. Ethical programs prioritize health, temperament, structure, and function — not novelty or market demand.
Finally, consistent breeding without an established waitlist or clear placement plan often reflects impulse rather than intention. Responsible programs breed with purpose, not with the hope that homes will appear afterward.
Core Principles
Patterns Matter More Than Promises
Red flags rarely appear alone — they reveal themselves through repeated decisions and explanations.
Evaluation Must Come Before Production
Maturity, health testing, and oversight are requirements, not optional delays.
Ethics Require Long-Term Thinking
Programs must consider genetic diversity, sustainability, and accountability — not trends or convenience.
Raising the Standard Means…
-
Looking beyond marketing and puppy photos
-
Evaluating how a program operates as a whole
-
Recognizing that scale, trends, and access reflect priorities
-
Understanding that responsible breeding is intentional, not reactive
Takeaway
None of these red flags exist in isolation.
But together, they reveal priorities.
Raising the standard means learning to look beyond marketing and puppy photos and instead evaluating the program as a whole. Because red flags don’t just point out risk — they tell you what a breeder values.